|
| Author |
Message |
andy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 1601
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:32 pm Post subject: rebuilding |
 |
|
Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit of
enginerring!
Archived from group: uk>sport>football>clubs>rangers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Floyd
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> of enginerring!
>
Moonbeams...LMAO! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dü the hüsker
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 563
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> of enginerring!
>
Sooooooo gullible!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mad Max
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 133
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:54 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
On Jan 6, 11:32 am, "andy" wrote:
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit of
> enginerring!
Andy any idea who your stalker is?
this keerydale floyd goes every where you go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 1601
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:37 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"Mad Max" wrote in message @l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 6, 11:32 am, "andy" wrote:
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> of
> enginerring!
Andy any idea who your stalker is?
this keerydale floyd goes every where you go.
no but he evidently loves me  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 1601
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"dü the hüsker" wrote in message $036.5396@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining
>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd
>> bit of enginerring!
>>
> Sooooooo gullible!!
>
why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonbhoy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 820
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:02 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> of enginerring!
Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but that
would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building including
any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as much time in
planning permission being passed as it would building knowing the powers
that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have thought it would have been
better to move location than just add.And if building goes ahead i wonder if
they will have to groundshare or use hampden for a season.Similar things
happened at highbury when they wanted to expand (similar in the way they
have a graded part of the ground one side),in the end they had two
choices....either forget the idea or move location.
JB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mad Max
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 133
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:48 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
On Jan 6, 5:02 pm, "Jonbhoy" wrote:
> "andy" wrote in message
>
> @bt.com...
>
> > Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> > infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> > of enginerring!
>
> Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but that
> would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building including
Done
> any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as much time in
Done
> planning permission being passed as it would building knowing the powers
Done.
> that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have thought it would have been
> better to move location than just add.And if building goes ahead i wonder if
> they will have to groundshare or use hampden for a season.Similar things
yip like parkhead.
> happened at highbury when they wanted to expand (similar in the way they
> have a graded part of the ground one side),in the end they had two
> choices....either forget the idea or move location.
>
you would like that wouldnt you.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moody Marco
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 2149
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:52 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"Jonbhoy" wrote in message @giganews.com...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining
>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd
>> bit of enginerring!
>
> Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but
> that would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building
> including any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as
> much time in planning permission being passed as it would building knowing
> the powers that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have thought it
> would have been better to move location than just add.And if building goes
> ahead i wonder if they will have to groundshare or use hampden for a
> season.Similar things happened at highbury when they wanted to expand
> (similar in the way they have a graded part of the ground one side),in the
> end they had two choices....either forget the idea or move location.
>
> JB
>
Arsenal have made a fortune turning Highbury into flats |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonbhoy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 820
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"Moody Marco" wrote in message @giganews.com...
>
> "Jonbhoy" wrote in message
> @giganews.com...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> @bt.com...
>>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining
>>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a
>>> wierd bit of enginerring!
>>
>> Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but
>> that would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building
>> including any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as
>> much time in planning permission being passed as it would building
>> knowing the powers that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have
>> thought it would have been better to move location than just add.And if
>> building goes ahead i wonder if they will have to groundshare or use
>> hampden for a season.Similar things happened at highbury when they wanted
>> to expand (similar in the way they have a graded part of the ground one
>> side),in the end they had two choices....either forget the idea or move
>> location.
>>
>> JB
>>
>
> Arsenal have made a fortune turning Highbury into flats
Indeed,but is still a small amount in terms of money towards their
stadium.Thats what i am trying to say though,if Rangers want to build a
stadium that size they would be better moving location.Remember though the
cost of building a 70,000 seater stadium in Glasgow will be huge,but even
building apartments etc on "the old ibrox" wont raise anything like the
amount of money raised in terms of building in islington.
JB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Grande Mal
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 26
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:30 am Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> of enginerring!
Maybe they'll just tear out the seats and put in smaller ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oso
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 75
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"Grande Mal" wrote in message
news:%8ggj.55733$5l3.20296@edtnps82...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining
>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd
>> bit of enginerring!
>
> Maybe they'll just tear out the seats and put in smaller ones.
Aye right. I can barely fit my wide load on to the ones they have already.
--
Fidei Coticula Crux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dü the hüsker
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 563
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:32 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
>
> "dü the hüsker" wrote in message
> $036.5396@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> @bt.com...
>>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining
>>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a
>>> wierd bit of enginerring!
>>>
>> Sooooooo gullible!!
>>
>
> why?
>
How many times are you going to swallow his pipe-dreams?
Remember King and Lewis' investments and how it would take Rangers to
another level? Rangers would spend a tenner for every Celtic fiver?
Supercasino?Moonbeams? lol
Not all Rangers supporters are gullible, there was a section chanting about
David Murray's lies not so long ago. He's desperate to leave but no-one's
interested in taking over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mad Max
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 133
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
On Jan 8, 10:32 am, "dü the hüsker" wrote:
>
> Not all Rangers supporters are gullible, there was a section chanting about
> David Murray's lies not so long ago. He's desperate to leave but no-one's
> interested in taking over.
Really, care to back that up? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dü the hüsker
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 563
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:27 am Post subject: Re: rebuilding |
|
|
"Mad Max" wrote in message @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 8, 10:32 am, "dü the hüsker" wrote:
>
> Not all Rangers supporters are gullible, there was a section chanting
> about
> David Murray's lies not so long ago. He's desperate to leave but no-one's
> interested in taking over.
Really, care to back that up?
Sure, which bit are you too gullible to understand?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
