|
| Author |
Message |
\\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:49 pm Post subject: Luke Moore |
|
|
Wasn't he being touted as a next Wonder-Kid a while ago?
At 21, I think a capped England Under-21 player for £3.5M isn't THAT big a
bump.
I think we could get a better player for £3M, but maybe at the expense of
youth and premiership experience.
What does anyone else think?
biz
--
www.bebo.com/bizenya79
www.myspace.com/bizenya
It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win or
lose. - Weinberg
Archived from group: uk>sport>football>clubs>rangers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Will
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 780
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/ wrote:
> Wasn't he being touted as a next Wonder-Kid a while ago?
> At 21, I think a capped England Under-21 player for £3.5M isn't THAT big a
> bump.
>
> I think we could get a better player for £3M, but maybe at the expense of
> youth and premiership experience.
>
> What does anyone else think?
>
> biz
Michael Ball was the next wonderkid too.
Derek Johnston is on the wireless now, pretending he knows who Luke
Moore is, saying it would be "great business". This is the same Derek
Johnston that said £1.9mil for a full german internationalist was "risky".
He's an alright player, but £3.5m is crazy money for an SPL side to be
splashing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 1601
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:55 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
" \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote in message @bt.com...
> Wasn't he being touted as a next Wonder-Kid a while ago?
> At 21, I think a capped England Under-21 player for £3.5M isn't THAT big a
> bump.
>
> I think we could get a better player for £3M, but maybe at the expense of
> youth and premiership experience.
>
> What does anyone else think?
>
> biz
> --
> www.bebo.com/bizenya79
> www.myspace.com/bizenya
> It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win or
> lose. - Weinberg
>
We dont need him |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Voice Of Reason
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:50 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
>
> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>> Wasn't he being touted as a next Wonder-Kid a while ago?
>> At 21, I think a capped England Under-21 player for £3.5M isn't THAT big
>> a bump.
>>
>> I think we could get a better player for £3M, but maybe at the expense of
>> youth and premiership experience.
>>
>> What does anyone else think?
>>
>> biz
>> --
>> www.bebo.com/bizenya79
>> www.myspace.com/bizenya
>> It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win or
>> lose. - Weinberg
>>
>
> We dont need him
I dont think Rangers need another striker, if they give Kris Boyd a decent
run in the team he should be able to assert himself as a first pick, with
the likes of Naismith, Novo and Burke buzzing down the wings and putting
crosses in you need , IMO, a poacher in the box to dispatch them into the
net and Kris is the very man to do that. His record compared to Cousin this
season even though he has started fewer games is better. The only thing I
think Cousin has over Boyd is upper body strength and a bit more pace, apart
from that I would say Kris is the better striker
Boyd P 13 (8 as sub) Scored 10
Cousin P 18 (8 as sub) Scored 9
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FishSupper
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"Voice Of Reason" wrote in message @corp.supernews.com...
> "andy" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>>
>> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote in message
>> @bt.com...
>>> Wasn't he being touted as a next Wonder-Kid a while ago?
>>> At 21, I think a capped England Under-21 player for £3.5M isn't THAT big
>>> a bump.
>>>
>>> I think we could get a better player for £3M, but maybe at the expense
>>> of youth and premiership experience.
>>>
>>> What does anyone else think?
>>>
>>> biz
>>> --
>>> www.bebo.com/bizenya79
>>> www.myspace.com/bizenya
>>> It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win or
>>> lose. - Weinberg
>>>
>>
>> We dont need him
>
>
> I dont think Rangers need another striker, if they give Kris Boyd a decent
> run in the team he should be able to assert himself as a first pick, with
> the likes of Naismith, Novo and Burke buzzing down the wings and putting
> crosses in you need , IMO, a poacher in the box to dispatch them into the
> net and Kris is the very man to do that. His record compared to Cousin
> this season even though he has started fewer games is better. The only
> thing I think Cousin has over Boyd is upper body strength and a bit more
> pace, apart from that I would say Kris is the better striker
>
> Boyd P 13 (8 as sub) Scored 10
> Cousin P 18 (8 as sub) Scored 9
>
How many game-winning goals for Boyd as opposed to Cousin? Boyd seems to
score a lot of 92nd minute goals in 3-0 victories |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
liam
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 229
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:52 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"Voice Of Reason" wrote
>>>
>>
>> We dont need him
>
> I dont think Rangers need another striker, if they give Kris Boyd a decent
> run in the team he should be able to assert himself as a first pick, with
> the likes of Naismith, Novo and Burke buzzing down the wings and putting
> crosses in you need , IMO, a poacher in the box to dispatch them into the
> net and Kris is the very man to do that. His record compared to Cousin
> this season even though he has started fewer games is better. The only
> thing I think Cousin has over Boyd is upper body strength and a bit more
> pace, apart from that I would say Kris is the better striker
>
> Boyd P 13 (8 as sub) Scored 10
> Cousin P 18 (8 as sub) Scored 9
I'd be amazed if Rangers went with Boyd as their one up front. Smith
described Cousin as a "conundrum" last weekend, and to think that you would
go with a guy that couldn;t get a start ahead of a "conundrum" would, imho,
have most Celtic fans rubbing their hands with glee. I just can't see Smith
sitting on the cash. I'd be very sceptical about Rangers chances of winning
the league with Boyd up front but you never know... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FishSupper
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:15 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"FishSupper" wrote in message @bt.com...
>
> "Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
> @corp.supernews.com...
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> @bt.com...
>>>
>>> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote in message
>>> @bt.com...
>>>> Wasn't he being touted as a next Wonder-Kid a while ago?
>>>> At 21, I think a capped England Under-21 player for £3.5M isn't THAT
>>>> big a bump.
>>>>
>>>> I think we could get a better player for £3M, but maybe at the expense
>>>> of youth and premiership experience.
>>>>
>>>> What does anyone else think?
>>>>
>>>> biz
>>>> --
>>>> www.bebo.com/bizenya79
>>>> www.myspace.com/bizenya
>>>> It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win
>>>> or lose. - Weinberg
>>>>
>>>
>>> We dont need him
>>
>>
>> I dont think Rangers need another striker, if they give Kris Boyd a
>> decent run in the team he should be able to assert himself as a first
>> pick, with the likes of Naismith, Novo and Burke buzzing down the wings
>> and putting crosses in you need , IMO, a poacher in the box to dispatch
>> them into the net and Kris is the very man to do that. His record
>> compared to Cousin this season even though he has started fewer games is
>> better. The only thing I think Cousin has over Boyd is upper body
>> strength and a bit more pace, apart from that I would say Kris is the
>> better striker
>>
>> Boyd P 13 (8 as sub) Scored 10
>> Cousin P 18 (8 as sub) Scored 9
>>
>
> How many game-winning goals for Boyd as opposed to Cousin? Boyd seems to
> score a lot of 92nd minute goals in 3-0 victories
or hat-tricks in 6-0 victories |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Angof
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
FishSupper wrote:
> "FishSupper" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>>
>> "Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
>>
>> How many game-winning goals for Boyd as opposed to Cousin? Boyd
>> seems to score a lot of 92nd minute goals in 3-0 victories
>
> or hat-tricks in 6-0 victories
....or he just seems to score a lot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FishSupper
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"Angof" wrote in message @corp.supernews.com...
> FishSupper wrote:
>> "FishSupper" wrote in message
>> @bt.com...
>>>
>>> "Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
>>>
>>> How many game-winning goals for Boyd as opposed to Cousin? Boyd
>>> seems to score a lot of 92nd minute goals in 3-0 victories
>>
>> or hat-tricks in 6-0 victories
>
> ...or he just seems to score a lot.
That he does. But the value of a striker surely has to be when he scores and
against who he scores. Boyd doesn't do it often enough in the big games and
hardly ever in the wee games either.
Boyd's winning goals so far:
v Gretna (1st goal in a 4-0 win)
v ICT (1st goal in a 2-0 win)
In other words, he hasn't scored one single decisive goal this season, since
we would have won these games anyway.
Compare with:
Darchevilles winning goals:
v ICT in a 1-0 win
v Killie (1st goal in a 2-0 win)
v Falkirk (2nd goal in a 3-1 win)
v Killie (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
v VFB Stuttgart (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
Cousin's winning goals
V Gretna (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
V Hibs (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
V Falkirk (3nd goal in a 7-2 win)
McCulloch's winning goals
v Hearts (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
v Aberdeen (1st goal in a 3-0 win)
v Lyon (1st goal in a 3-0 win)
Even Ferguson, Novo, Beasley and Naismith have had more impact in terms of
important goals scored.
I don't doubt that Boyd has potential to be an Ibrox Great - but he's miles
away from being anywhere near there at the moment and he's even further away
from being nearly as good as he thinks he is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Angof
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
FishSupper wrote:
> "Angof" wrote in message
> @corp.supernews.com...
>> FishSupper wrote:
>>> "FishSupper" wrote in message
>>> @bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> How many game-winning goals for Boyd as opposed to Cousin? Boyd
>>>> seems to score a lot of 92nd minute goals in 3-0 victories
>>>
>>> or hat-tricks in 6-0 victories
>>
>> ...or he just seems to score a lot.
>
> That he does. But the value of a striker surely has to be when he
> scores and against who he scores. Boyd doesn't do it often enough in
> the big games and hardly ever in the wee games either.
>
>
> Boyd's winning goals so far:
>
> v Gretna (1st goal in a 4-0 win)
> v ICT (1st goal in a 2-0 win)
>
> In other words, he hasn't scored one single decisive goal this
> season, since we would have won these games anyway.
>
>
> Compare with:
>
> Darchevilles winning goals:
>
> v ICT in a 1-0 win
> v Killie (1st goal in a 2-0 win)
> v Falkirk (2nd goal in a 3-1 win)
> v Killie (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> v VFB Stuttgart (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
>
> Cousin's winning goals
> V Gretna (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> V Hibs (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> V Falkirk (3nd goal in a 7-2 win)
>
> McCulloch's winning goals
>
> v Hearts (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> v Aberdeen (1st goal in a 3-0 win)
> v Lyon (1st goal in a 3-0 win)
>
>
> Even Ferguson, Novo, Beasley and Naismith have had more impact in
> terms of important goals scored.
>
> I don't doubt that Boyd has potential to be an Ibrox Great - but he's
> miles away from being anywhere near there at the moment and he's even
> further away from being nearly as good as he thinks he is.
I've no idea how good he thinks he is. It's true that his record in big
games is not the best. Analysing individual goals as you have here makes
little sense though. For example...Boyd would probably have taken the
penalty v Stuttgart had he been on (may not have missed the sitter v Lyon
come to that). Fact is he has not been in the position to score those
decisive goals as he hasn't been on the field for the most part. Whatever
his strengths and weaknesses as a player...I think he'll score more goals
than JCD or Cousin. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Voice Of Reason
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:04 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"FishSupper" wrote in message @bt.com...
>
> "Angof" wrote in message
> @corp.supernews.com...
>> FishSupper wrote:
>>> "FishSupper" wrote in message
>>> @bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> How many game-winning goals for Boyd as opposed to Cousin? Boyd
>>>> seems to score a lot of 92nd minute goals in 3-0 victories
>>>
>>> or hat-tricks in 6-0 victories
>>
>> ...or he just seems to score a lot.
>
> That he does. But the value of a striker surely has to be when he scores
> and against who he scores. Boyd doesn't do it often enough in the big
> games and hardly ever in the wee games either.
>
>
> Boyd's winning goals so far:
>
> v Gretna (1st goal in a 4-0 win)
> v ICT (1st goal in a 2-0 win)
>
> In other words, he hasn't scored one single decisive goal this season,
> since we would have won these games anyway.
>
>
> Compare with:
>
> Darchevilles winning goals:
>
> v ICT in a 1-0 win
> v Killie (1st goal in a 2-0 win)
> v Falkirk (2nd goal in a 3-1 win)
> v Killie (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> v VFB Stuttgart (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
>
> Cousin's winning goals
> V Gretna (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> V Hibs (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> V Falkirk (3nd goal in a 7-2 win)
>
> McCulloch's winning goals
>
> v Hearts (2nd goal in a 2-1 win)
> v Aberdeen (1st goal in a 3-0 win)
> v Lyon (1st goal in a 3-0 win)
>
>
> Even Ferguson, Novo, Beasley and Naismith have had more impact in terms of
> important goals scored.
>
> I don't doubt that Boyd has potential to be an Ibrox Great - but he's
> miles away from being anywhere near there at the moment and he's even
> further away from being nearly as good as he thinks he is.
It doesnt matter when a goal is scored as long as it is scored before the
final whistle, I'm sure that a few seasons ago when Rangers won the league
by 1 goal celtic would not have minded if their top striker had scored all
his goals in the final minute of the games he played in as long as the GD
column was 1 more than ours. All goals count whether match winning or last
one in a 6 nil rout
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moody Marco
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 2149
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:26 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
>consistently excelling ourself in Europe, I think we
Weren't Celtic in pot 2 for last season's CL group? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andy
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 1601
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:48 am Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"Moody Marco" wrote in message @giganews.com...
> >consistently excelling ourself in Europe, I think we
>
> Weren't Celtic in pot 2 for last season's CL group?
>
they were aye |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moody Marco
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 2149
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:42 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"andy" wrote in message @bt.com...
>
> "Moody Marco" wrote in message
> @giganews.com...
>> >consistently excelling ourself in Europe, I think we
>>
>> Weren't Celtic in pot 2 for last season's CL group?
>>
>
> they were aye
>
Thought so. So reaching the last 16 was not "excelling". The year before
that they got pumped by Bratislava and didn't even drop in to the UEFA Cup.
So this year is the only year under Strachan they can be considered to have
done better than expected. Hardly what you'd call "consistently"... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
celticbhoy60
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: Re: Luke Moore |
|
|
"Moody Marco" wrote in message @giganews.com...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> @bt.com...
>>
>> "Moody Marco" wrote in message
>> @giganews.com...
>>> >consistently excelling ourself in Europe, I think we
>>>
>>> Weren't Celtic in pot 2 for last season's CL group?
>>>
>>
>> they were aye
>>
>
> Thought so. So reaching the last 16 was not "excelling". The year before
> that they got pumped by Bratislava and didn't even drop in to the UEFA
> Cup. So this year is the only year under Strachan they can be considered
> to have done better than expected. Hardly what you'd call
> "consistently"...
How did your lot do in last seasons CL? oh, I forgot you didn't make it
LOL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|