yourdomain.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Leeds request court hearing

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Leeds United
Author Message
Sniffer-Dog



Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 60

PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 1:32 am    Post subject: Leeds request court hearing Reply with quote

- -
"In September the club invited the Football Association to set up an
independent commission to investigate the legality of the 15-point
sanction imposed by the Football League," said a statement on the
club's website.

"The FA rejected that request, so the following month we wrote to the
chairman - Geoff Thompson - drawing his attention to what we perceived
as inconsistencies in the FA's decision and asked them to look at it
again.

"The reply to the second request was rejected by the FA's director of
corporate affairs. This is the same person who rejected the original
request.

"In effect, the same individual confirmed his own earlier decision.
There was no independent review.

"Given the approach of the FA to date, the club have severe
reservations regarding its impartiality."

Complete article:
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/23112007/1/leeds-request-court-hearing.html
Source: Yahoo/Team Talk (2007)

- -

The director of FA corporate affairs is a certain Simon Johnson. Given
that Simon Johnson himself is a devoted Leeds supporter, could he have
possibly rejected Leeds' request so that people don't think he is
being biased? If this is the case then he clearly is being biased.

Due to his support for Leeds it could be this situation that he feels
he has to reject the Leeds request because if he didn't he thinks it
would look suspicious?

Whatever the reason it is clear that someone who supports the club at
the FA can not make an impartial decision either way as he will be
vilified. So why not let someone else at the FA make the decision?

If they don't then perhaps Leeds should take legal action as I believe
we are being discriminated against and not treated equally or fairly.

This is clearly the case when in the past the FA decisions have not
been consistent in the exact same situation as that in which Leeds
were deducted the 15 points. Perhaps our performance this season is
also playing a part in the FA's corruption and refusal to give us a
fair hearing?

15 points who gives a f**k? Super Leeds are going up?

Sniffer-Dog

Archived from group: uk>sport>football>clubs>leeds-united
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Leeds Leeds Leeds Oct/Nov Front cover is flaming ironic. Dennis and Gus - Preparing to succeed! Just not at the same club. Sniffer-Dog

Leeds up to 3rd Has anybody else noticed that no one on the media seems to mention that Leeds are now 4th !!!!! Anti Leeds or what

Leeds oh Leeds....... Revie will be turning in his grave Its not hurting anyone and it makes me happy so stop judging me......

leeds rhinos keeping the good name of sport in leeds, rugby pisses all over football in terms of gentelmanly conduct and sporting behaviour, leeds will always be a rugby firsy city and soccer 2nd.

It's great to be a Leeds fan when........................... You're sat in a room full of Huddersfield Town fans watching them get a stuffing by Donny Rovers, listening to their whining excuses and empty threats of what their team will do in their "Cup Final" at Elland Rd. Quality!!
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Leeds United All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group